Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
How PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. stacks up
PFLT · against 82 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Valuation
41/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #56 of 83 · scores higher than 32% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score5 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including PFLT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 41?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -8.7% vs peer median 6.1%
- EBITDA yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 7.5% vs peer median 5.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PFLT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PFLT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 148 reported | 7.5% | 6.2% | 54% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 53 reported | Not reported | 8.1% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 57 reported | -8.7% | 11.5% | 9% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 142 reported | 154.2% | 111.8% | 80% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PFLT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 498M USD | 100 | 90 | |
| 1 | 641M USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 827M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 5 | 1.1B CAD (≈$782M) | 98 | 59 | |
| 53 | 36.3B TWD (≈$1.1B) | 49 | 29 | |
| 54 | 7.1B HKD (≈$914M) | 46 | 48 | |
| 55 | 1.1B USD | 44 | 37 | |
| 56 | 530M EUR (≈$583M) | 41 | 43 | |
| 56 | 674M USD | 41 | 53 | |
| 58 | 41.9B INR (≈$502M) | 38 | 67 | |
| 59 | 3.8B SEK (≈$376M) | 36 | 49 | |
| 60 | 555.6B CLP (≈$611M) | 34 | 50 | |
| 61 | 3.6B CNY (≈$502M) | 33 | 42 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score