Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
How PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. stacks up
PFLT · against 121 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Profitability
45/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #61 of 122 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score16 peers with a profitability score of 40–49, including PFLT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 62% of peers. Return on assets: 1.9% vs peer median 2.6%
- Operating margin is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 6.6% vs peer median 6.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PFLT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PFLT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 118 reported | 6.6% | 5.3% | 60% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 60 reported | Not reported | 21.7% | — | — | 33% |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 138 reported | 1.9% | 2.6% | 36% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 134 reported | 4.8% | 6.6% | 40% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 155 reported | 100.0% | 96.9% | 52% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PFLTScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score