Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
How PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. stacks up
PFLT · against 161 other Financial Services companies listed in US-listed
Profitability
45/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #89 of 162 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score20 peers with a profitability score of 40–49, including PFLT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 62% of peers. Return on assets: 1.9% vs peer median 2.6%
- Operating margin is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 6.6% vs peer median 6.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PFLT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PFLT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 157 reported | 6.6% | 7.1% | 44% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 84 reported | Not reported | 23.1% | — | — | 33% |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 183 reported | 1.9% | 2.6% | 36% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 176 reported | 4.8% | 10.4% | 30% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 200 reported | 100.0% | 83.0% | 57% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PFLT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 566.9B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 2 | 2.7B USD | 98 | 63 | |
| 2 | 31.1B USD | 98 | 65 | |
| 4 | 4.2B USD | 97 | 55 | |
| 4 | 2.7B USD | 97 | 58 | |
| 85 | Unavailable | 47 | 43 | |
| 88 | 5.2B USD | 46 | 45 | |
| 89 | 4.4B USD | 45 | 53 | |
| 89 | 16.2B USD | 45 | 37 | |
| 89 | 674M USD | 45 | 53 | |
| 92 | 400M USD | 44 | ||
| 92 | 3.3B USD | 44 | 57 | |
| 92 | 269M USD | 44 | 36 | |
| 95 | 14.6B USD | 43 | 20 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score