Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
How Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. stacks up
PESI · against 595 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
9/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #464 of 596 · scores higher than 19% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score133 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including PESI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 9?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -6.2% vs peer median 6.9%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -7.6% vs peer median 3.8%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -7.8% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PESI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PESI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 589 reported | -7.4% | 2.4% | 14% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 606 reported | -6.6% | 6.3% | 8% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 143 reported | -8.0% | 3.2% | 18% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 595 reported | 21.1% | 61.1% | 13% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PESI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 462M USD | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 323M USD | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 2.9B BRL (≈$517M) | 100 | 68 | |
| 464 | 15.5B TRY (≈$464M) | 9 | ||
| 464 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score