Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PDS · against 112 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #82 of 113 · scores higher than 28% of peers · safety percentile 29
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)12 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including PDS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, which is weaker than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | PDS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 109 reported | 0.43× | 0.55× | 56% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 111 reported | 1.29 | 0.49 | 7% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 112 reported | 1.46× | 1.33× | 54% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 2 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 3 | 1.3B GBP (≈$1.7B) | 99 | ||
| 4 | 1.2B USD | 98 | 68 | |
| 5 | 10.1B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 97 | 50 | |
| 78 | 9.2B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 32 | 14 | |
| 79 | 900M USD | 31 | 56 | |
| 80 | 1.9B CAD (≈$1.4B) | 29 | 52 | |
| 81 | 2.2B CAD (≈$1.6B) | 29 | 37 | |
| 82 | 1.2B USD | 29 | 32 | |
| 83 | 68.4B THB (≈$1.9B) | 28 | 66 | |
| 84 | 1.5B USD | 26 | 50 | |
| 85 | 9.6B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 26 | 37 | |
| 86 | 1.0B USD | 24 | 24 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score