Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PDFS · against 477 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #206 of 478 · scores higher than 57% of peers · safety percentile 58
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)60 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including PDFS · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | PDFS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 465 reported | 0.19× | 0.23× | 53% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 459 reported | 1.66 | 0.82 | 11% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 474 reported | 3.45× | 1.88× | 80% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 3 | 1.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 4 | 2.0B USD | 99 | 45 | |
| 5 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 202 | 19.4B CNY (≈$2.7B) | 59 | 30 | |
| 203 | 1.8B USD | 59 | 39 | |
| 204 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 58 | 71 | |
| 205 | 105.5B TWD (≈$3.3B) | 58 | 65 | |
| 206 | 1.8B USD | 58 | 56 | |
| 207 | 3.1B USD | 58 | 84 | |
| 208 | 7.9B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 57 | 62 | |
| 209 | 9.9B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 57 | 58 | |
| 210 | 14.2B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 57 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score