Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Pacific Gas and Electric Company
How Pacific Gas and Electric Company stacks up
PCG-PA · against 6 other Miscellaneous companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
86/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #2 of 7 · scores higher than 83% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score1 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including PCG-PA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 86?
Weighted metrics compared with all Miscellaneous companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, which is stronger than most Miscellaneous peers.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 9.3% vs peer median 9.3%
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 100% of peers. EBITDA yield: 17.4% vs peer median 6.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PCG-PA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PCG-PA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 12 reported | 9.3% | 8.6% | 55% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 2 reported | 17.4% | 11.6% | 100% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 2 reported | Not reported | -2.7% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 9 reported | 768.1% | 88.4% | 100% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PCG-PA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 31.1B USD | 98 | 60 | |
| 2 | Unavailable | 86 | 50 | |
| 3 | 6.6B USD | 69 | ||
| 4 | Unavailable | 31 | 25 | |
| 5 | 3.2B USD | 24 | 45 | |
| 6 | 3.7B USD | 18 | 30 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score