Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PBT · against 114 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #31 of 115 · scores higher than 74% of peers · safety percentile 77
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)10 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including PBT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | PBT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 111 reported | Not reported | 0.53× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 112 reported | 0.50 | 0.46 | 45% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 114 reported | 1.96× | 1.36× | 68% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 2 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 3 | 1.3B GBP (≈$1.7B) | 99 | ||
| 4 | 1.2B USD | 98 | 68 | |
| 5 | 10.1B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 97 | 50 | |
| 27 | 1.4B CAD (≈$986M) | 79 | 67 | |
| 28 | 4.1B SAR (≈$1.1B) | 78 | 61 | |
| 29 | 2.1B USD | 77 | 65 | |
| 30 | 3.3B AUD (≈$2.2B) | 77 | 34 | |
| 31 | 1.3B USD | 77 | 59 | |
| 32 | 1.0B SGD (≈$798M) | 76 | 53 | |
| 33 | 2.0B USD | 74 | 39 | |
| 34 | 148.6B JPY (≈$1.0B) | 73 | 66 | |
| 35 | 2.1B AUD (≈$1.4B) | 71 | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score