Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Pembina Pipeline Corporation
How Pembina Pipeline Corporation stacks up
PBA · against 43 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
33/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #29 of 44 · scores higher than 35% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score7 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including PBA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 33?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth, which is weaker than most Energy peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 84% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -12.5% vs peer median -1.3%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: -9.2% vs peer median 1.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.3% vs peer median 0.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PBA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PBA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 44 reported | 5.3% | -0.2% | 63% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 41 reported | -9.2% | 2.9% | 38% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 44 reported | -12.5% | -3.5% | 5% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PBA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20.8B USD | 98 | 83 | |
| 2 | 15.9B USD | 97 | 59 | |
| 3 | 31.6B USD | 96 | 56 | |
| 4 | 33.9B USD | 91 | 71 | |
| 4 | 20.1B USD | 91 | 65 | |
| 25 | 28.4B USD | 41 | 48 | |
| 26 | 3.73T JPY (≈$25.4B) | 38 | 63 | |
| 27 | 56.7B USD | 34 | 57 | |
| 27 | 32.3B EUR (≈$35.5B) | 34 | 59 | |
| 29 | 28.7B USD | 33 | 37 | |
| 30 | 651.7B TRY (≈$19.6B) | 31 | 69 | |
| 31 | 4.69T JPY (≈$31.9B) | 30 | 67 | |
| 31 | 286.67T IDR (≈$17.8B) | 30 | 62 | |
| 33 | 42.5B USD | 29 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score