Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.
How Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. stacks up
PARR · against 193 other Energy companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
97/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #3 of 194 · scores higher than 99% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score9 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including PARR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 97?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 79% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 11.5% vs peer median 6.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 91% of peers. EBITDA yield: 31.2% vs peer median 12.1%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 96% of peers. Earnings yield: 24.0% vs peer median 5.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PARR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PARR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 189 reported | 24.0% | 5.2% | 99% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 190 reported | 28.1% | 11.9% | 96% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 184 reported | 11.5% | 5.9% | 84% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 190 reported | 56.4% | 50.6% | 55% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PARR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 1.1B USD | 98 | 55 | |
| 3 | 3.6B USD | 97 | 85 | |
| 4 | 254M USD | 96 | 88 | |
| 5 | 6.4B USD | 95 | 68 | |
| 5 | 428M USD | 95 | 57 | |
| 7 | 496M USD | 93 | 85 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score