Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Pampa Energía S.A.
How Pampa Energía S.A. stacks up
PAM · against 544 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
23/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #473 of 545 · scores higher than 12% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score37 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including PAM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 23?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Industrials peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 95% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -69.5% vs peer median 7.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.0% vs peer median 4.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.5% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PAM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PAM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 546 reported | 6.5% | 7.0% | 49% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 466 reported | -69.5% | 9.0% | 6% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 540 reported | 3.0% | 6.5% | 34% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PAM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 74.1B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 22.5B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 4.6B USD | 100 | 58 | |
| 473 | 17.7B CNY (≈$2.5B) | 23 | 42 | |
| 473 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.1B) | 23 | 33 | |
| 473 | 5.1B USD | 23 | 49 | |
| 473 | 3.5B USD | 23 | 49 | |
| 473 | 3.7B USD | 23 | 67 | |
| 479 | 1.02T JPY (≈$6.9B) | 22 | 41 | |
| 479 | 623.1B JPY (≈$4.2B) | 22 | 43 | |
| 479 | 2.2B EUR (≈$2.5B) | 22 | 28 | |
| 479 | 4.4B EUR (≈$4.9B) | 22 | 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score