Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PAGS · against 461 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #280 of 462 · scores higher than 39% of peers · safety percentile 43
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)51 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including PAGS · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker beta and current ratio than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | PAGS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 451 reported | 0.12× | 0.23× | 65% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 443 reported | 1.27 | 0.88 | 27% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 458 reported | 1.55× | 1.89× | 36% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 3 | 1.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 4 | 2.0B USD | 99 | 45 | |
| 5 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 276 | 2.3B AUD (≈$1.5B) | 43 | 41 | |
| 277 | 10.0B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 43 | 15 | |
| 278 | 100.3B TWD (≈$3.1B) | 43 | 83 | |
| 279 | 2.7B USD | 43 | 54 | |
| 280 | 2.1B USD | 43 | 73 | |
| 281 | 2.3B EUR (≈$2.5B) | 42 | 49 | |
| 282 | 1.5B USD | 42 | 54 | |
| 283 | 90.9B TWD (≈$2.8B) | 42 | 59 | |
| 284 | 410.6B JPY (≈$2.8B) | 42 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score