Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Plains GP Holdings, L.P.
How Plains GP Holdings, L.P. stacks up
PAGP · against 109 other Energy companies of similar size
Valuation
95/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #4 of 110 · scores higher than 96% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score10 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including PAGP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 95?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, which is stronger than most Energy peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 77% of peers. Earnings yield: 37.8% vs peer median 5.2%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 66% of peers. EBITDA yield: 20.3% vs peer median 12.1%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 96% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 43.4% vs peer median 6.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PAGP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PAGP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 110 reported | 1.6% | 6.2% | 13% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 108 reported | 9.6% | 13.3% | 29% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 72 reported | 36.4% | 6.8% | 99% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 109 reported | 28.9% | 56.3% | 15% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PAGP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 664.7B JPY (≈$4.5B) | 97 | 65 | |
| 2 | 3.6B USD | 97 | 85 | |
| 4 | 66.2B HKD (≈$8.5B) | 95 | 68 | |
| 4 | 6.4B USD | 95 | 68 | |
| 6 | 6.0B AUD (≈$4.0B) | 93 | 57 | |
| 7 | 5.1B EUR (≈$5.6B) | 92 | 71 | |
| 7 | 4.3B GBP (≈$5.6B) | 92 | 75 | |
| 9 | 7.9B USD | 91 | 79 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score