Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PAG · against 153 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #78 of 154 · scores higher than 50% of peers · safety percentile 37
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)19 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including PAG · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | PAG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 149 reported | 1.61× | 0.69× | 22% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 155 reported | 0.91 | 0.92 | 51% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 150 reported | 0.97× | 1.47× | 16% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.75T JPY (≈$11.9B) | 97 | 51 | |
| 2 | 9.5B CHF (≈$10.9B) | 96 | 37 | |
| 3 | 112.0B CNY (≈$15.7B) | 95 | 53 | |
| 4 | 3.98T JPY (≈$27.1B) | 94 | 74 | |
| 5 | 7.8B EUR (≈$8.6B) | 94 | 61 | |
| 74 | 10.5B USD | 42 | 57 | |
| 75 | 13.5B USD | 41 | 62 | |
| 76 | 23.5B USD | 40 | 62 | |
| 77 | 7.2B EUR (≈$7.9B) | 37 | 52 | |
| 78 | 13.9B USD | 37 | 44 | |
| 79 | 7.4B USD | 36 | 64 | |
| 80 | 5.9B GBP (≈$7.6B) | 36 | 50 | |
| 81 | 8.6B USD | 35 | 49 | |
| 82 | 8.8B USD | 35 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score