Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PAC · against 260 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #172 of 261 · scores higher than 34% of peers · safety percentile 28
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)45 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including PAC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | PAC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 256 reported | 1.18× | 0.56× | 19% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 251 reported | 0.29 | 0.86 | 88% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 253 reported | 0.74× | 1.52× | 6% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22.4B USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 1.36T JPY (≈$9.2B) | 96 | 70 | |
| 3 | 3.91T JPY (≈$26.6B) | 95 | 70 | |
| 4 | 1.06T JPY (≈$7.2B) | 94 | 76 | |
| 5 | 1.44T JPY (≈$9.8B) | 94 | 73 | |
| 168 | 9.2B EUR (≈$10.2B) | 29 | 62 | |
| 169 | 7.2B USD | 29 | 60 | |
| 170 | 18.9B USD | 28 | 27 | |
| 171 | 15.8B USD | 28 | 45 | |
| 172 | 14.2B USD | 28 | 64 | |
| 173 | 28.6B AUD (≈$18.9B) | 28 | 58 | |
| 174 | 5.9B GBP (≈$7.7B) | 27 | 47 | |
| 175 | 51.3B CNY (≈$7.2B) | 27 | 53 | |
| 176 | 8.6B EUR (≈$9.5B) | 27 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score