Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Pan American Silver Corp.
How Pan American Silver Corp. stacks up
PAAS · against 108 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Valuation
68/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #45 of 109 · scores higher than 58% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score16 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including PAAS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 68?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 71% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 6.3% vs peer median 2.6%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 75% of peers. EBITDA yield: 11.1% vs peer median 8.5%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 82% of peers. Earnings yield: 6.1% vs peer median 3.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PAAS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PAAS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 109 reported | 8.8% | 5.9% | 76% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 110 reported | 13.8% | 11.3% | 66% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 40 reported | Not reported | 3.8% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 105 reported | 46.1% | 49.4% | 44% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PAAS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 155.7B ZAR (≈$8.6B) | 98 | 90 | |
| 2 | 195.7B HKD (≈$25.0B) | 97 | 74 | |
| 3 | 87.3B HKD (≈$11.2B) | 95 | 72 | |
| 3 | 11.4B USD | 95 | 67 | |
| 5 | 92.8B HKD (≈$11.9B) | 94 | 64 | |
| 42 | 224.6B CNY (≈$31.4B) | 70 | 51 | |
| 42 | 10.4B USD | 70 | 58 | |
| 42 | 25.5B CAD (≈$18.6B) | 70 | 65 | |
| 45 | 11.3B USD | 68 | 75 | |
| 45 | 15.9B USD | 68 | 75 | |
| 47 | 27.5B EUR (≈$30.3B) | 66 | 54 | |
| 47 | 95.7B SEK (≈$9.6B) | 66 | 55 | |
| 49 | 54.2B SAR (≈$14.6B) | 65 | 77 | |
| 50 | 58.2B CNY (≈$8.1B) | 64 | 82 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score