Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Pan American Silver Corp.
How Pan American Silver Corp. stacks up
PAAS · against 108 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Growth
99/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #4 of 109 · scores higher than 95% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score24 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including PAAS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 99?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 88% of peers. Revenue growth: 28.4% vs peer median 3.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 96% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 34.3% vs peer median -0.0%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 98% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 646.4% vs peer median 9.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PAAS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PAAS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 109 reported | 28.4% | 9.2% | 79% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 90 reported | 646.4% | 22.9% | 93% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 108 reported | 34.3% | 3.0% | 95% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PAAS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64.1B CNY (≈$9.0B) | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 13.8B USD | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 8.9B USD | 100 | 85 | |
| 4 | 11.9B CAD (≈$8.7B) | 99 | 80 | |
| 4 | 12.0B AUD (≈$8.0B) | 99 | 74 | |
| 4 | 15.9B USD | 99 | 75 | |
| 7 | 16.0B CAD (≈$11.7B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 7 | 486.3B MXN (≈$26.3B) | 98 | 91 | |
| 7 | 30.8B USD | 98 | 83 | |
| 10 | 11.3B USD | 97 | 75 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score