Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Owlet, Inc.
How Owlet, Inc. stacks up
OWLT · against 122 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Valuation
8/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #83 of 123 · scores higher than 6% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score41 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including OWLT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 8?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -7.1% vs peer median 1.5%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -6.0% vs peer median 4.0%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -6.9% vs peer median 0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OWLT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | OWLT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 108 reported | -13.0% | -11.8% | 49% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 130 reported | -6.3% | 0.4% | 40% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 89 reported | -8.0% | -15.7% | 65% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 112 reported | 19.0% | 68.4% | 20% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around OWLT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.1B HKD (≈$146M) | 99 | 72 | |
| 1 | 834M HKD (≈$107M) | 99 | 57 | |
| 1 | 1.4B HKD (≈$181M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 29.0B JPY (≈$197M) | 99 | 56 | |
| 1 | 592M ILS (≈$160M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 83 | 68M EUR (≈$75M) | 8 | 34 | |
| 83 | 79M EUR (≈$87M) | 8 | 34 | |
| 83 | 649M SEK (≈$65M) | 8 | 29 | |
| 83 | 107M USD | 8 | 26 | |
| 83 | 124M USD | 8 | 31 | |
| 83 | 170M USD | 8 | 35 | |
| 83 | 139M USD | 8 | 32 | |
| 83 | 223M USD | 8 | 34 | |
| 83 | 172M USD | 8 | 34 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score