Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Owlet, Inc.
How Owlet, Inc. stacks up
OWLT · against 128 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Profitability
22/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #72 of 129 · scores higher than 43% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score19 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including OWLT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 22?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its return on invested capital, return on assets and operating margin, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 89% of peers. Return on invested capital: -61.7% vs peer median 4.7%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 75% of peers. Return on assets: -9.4% vs peer median 1.7%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 72% of peers. Operating margin: -6.3% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OWLT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | OWLT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 98 reported | -61.7% | -13.5% | 25% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 118 reported | -6.3% | -5.6% | 49% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 134 reported | -9.4% | -3.2% | 44% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 124 reported | Not reported | -12.0% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 139 reported | 54.6% | 42.2% | 64% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around OWLT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.4B HKD (≈$181M) | 97 | 61 | |
| 1 | 356M AUD (≈$235M) | 97 | 81 | |
| 3 | 592M ILS (≈$160M) | 96 | 84 | |
| 4 | 157M USD | 95 | ||
| 5 | 1.3B BRL (≈$238M) | 89 | 77 | |
| 70 | 7.1B TWD (≈$221M) | 23 | 25 | |
| 70 | 107M USD | 23 | 26 | |
| 72 | 110M USD | 22 | 38 | |
| 72 | 239M USD | 22 | 38 | |
| 72 | 124M USD | 22 | 31 | |
| 75 | 1.6B HKD (≈$209M) | 21 | 54 | |
| 76 | 222M USD | 20 | 31 | |
| 76 | 106M EUR (≈$116M) | 20 | 46 | |
| 76 | 238M USD | 20 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score