Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Obook Holdings Inc.
How Obook Holdings Inc. stacks up
OWLS · against 275 other Technology companies of similar size
Profitability
0/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #272 of 276 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score58 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including OWLS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its return on assets and operating margin, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 100% of peers. Return on assets: -137.6% vs peer median 2.9%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 99% of peers. Operating margin: -409.8% vs peer median 6.3%
- Return on invested capital is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OWLS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | OWLS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 251 reported | Not reported | 2.0% | — | — | 33% |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 272 reported | -409.8% | 2.6% | 4% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 271 reported | -137.6% | 0.9% | 1% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 262 reported | Not reported | 2.9% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 276 reported | -0.4% | 29.7% | 5% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around OWLS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 604M AUD (≈$399M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 50.3B JPY (≈$342M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 2 | 1.1B MYR (≈$240M) | 99 | 75 | |
| 4 | 56.5B JPY (≈$384M) | 98 | 80 | |
| 5 | 259M USD | 97 | 82 | |
| 256 | 190M USD | 1 | 33 | |
| 272 | 2.1B CNY (≈$292M) | 0 | 2 | |
| 272 | 302M USD | 0 | ||
| 272 | 233M USD | 0 | 17 | |
| 272 | 201M USD | 0 | 20 | |
| 272 | 213M USD | 0 | 37 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score