Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Blue Owl Capital Inc.
How Blue Owl Capital Inc. stacks up
OWL · against 161 other Financial Services companies listed in US-listed
Profitability
45/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #89 of 162 · scores higher than 45% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score20 peers with a profitability score of 40–49, including OWL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 64% of peers. Operating margin: 16.9% vs peer median 23.5%
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 2.5% vs peer median 2.6%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 7.1% vs peer median 6.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OWL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | OWL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 157 reported | 7.1% | 7.1% | 50% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 84 reported | 16.9% | 23.1% | 36% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 183 reported | 2.5% | 2.6% | 47% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 176 reported | 5.7% | 10.4% | 33% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 200 reported | 58.5% | 83.0% | 39% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around OWL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.8B USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 1 | 574.6B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 3 | 31.7B USD | 98 | 64 | |
| 4 | 4.3B USD | 97 | 54 | |
| 4 | 2.9B USD | 97 | 58 | |
| 84 | Unavailable | 47 | 42 | |
| 86 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score