Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to OUTFRONT Media Inc.
How OUTFRONT Media Inc. stacks up
OUT · against 127 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
56/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #50 of 128 · scores higher than 60% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score26 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including OUT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 56?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 62% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 5.3% vs peer median 6.5%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.3% vs peer median 5.3%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.7% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OUT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | OUT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 131 reported | 4.3% | 5.0% | 40% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 127 reported | 5.0% | 5.6% | 37% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 65 reported | 5.1% | 5.5% | 47% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 134 reported | 12.2% | 89.0% | 2% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around OUT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.9B USD | 96 | 67 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 93 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.10T JPY (≈$7.5B) | 90 | 82 | |
| 4 | 2.9B USD | 89 | 68 | |
| 5 | 10.1B USD | 87 | 53 | |
| 48 | 6.7B EUR (≈$7.3B) | 57 | 51 | |
| 48 | 4.5B GBP (≈$5.9B) | 57 | 64 | |
| 50 | 5.4B EUR (≈$5.9B) | 56 | 53 | |
| 50 | 5.3B CAD (≈$3.8B) | 56 | 56 | |
| 50 | 5.7B USD | 56 | 56 | |
| 53 | 3.8B USD | 55 | 42 | |
| 53 | 5.9B USD | 55 | 74 | |
| 55 | 5.3B USD | 53 | 51 | |
| 55 | 5.2B USD | 53 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score