Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Otis Worldwide Corporation
How Otis Worldwide Corporation stacks up
OTIS · against 151 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
46/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #101 of 152 · scores higher than 32% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score23 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including OTIS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 46?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.5% vs peer median 4.2%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 3.3% vs peer median 7.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.2% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OTIS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | OTIS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 153 reported | 5.2% | 7.3% | 39% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 135 reported | 3.3% | 9.5% | 34% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 151 reported | 2.5% | 6.3% | 29% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around OTIS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.39T INR (≈$16.7B) | 97 | 54 | |
| 2 | 22.7B USD | 96 | 41 | |
| 3 | 63.3B CAD (≈$46.2B) | 95 | 56 | |
| 3 | 20.6B USD | 95 | 61 | |
| 3 | 51.7B USD | 95 | 58 | |
| 100 | 46.8B USD | 47 | 52 | |
| 101 | 126.9B HKD (≈$16.2B) | 46 | 68 | |
| 101 | 436.1B SEK (≈$43.6B) | 46 | 50 | |
| 101 | 21.1B USD | 46 | 50 | |
| 101 | 29.2B USD | 46 | 50 | |
| 105 | 26.6B USD | 45 | 55 | |
| 106 | 140.3B CNY (≈$19.6B) | 44 | 44 | |
| 106 | 5.51T JPY (≈$37.5B) | 44 | 58 | |
| 106 | 28.8B USD | 44 | 73 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score