Ranked #51 of 73 · scores higher than 31% of peers · safety percentile 22
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)
10 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including OTF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why “Higher relative risk”?
The measures below combine into a safety percentile of 22 among Financial Services companies. It is relative: 67 or more is lower relative risk, 33–66 moderate, below 33 higher.
Mainly because of its current ratio, which is weaker than most Financial Services peers.
▼fewer short-term assets to cover bills due within a year: weaker than 96% of peers. Current ratio: 0.17× vs peer median 2.02×
●Debt / equity is close to the peer norm. Debt / equity: 0.95× vs peer median 0.57×
●Beta is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OTF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
OTF
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Debt / equityLower is better · 68 reported
0.95×
0.77×
46%
33%
BetaLower is better · 75 reported
Not reported
0.69
—
—
33%
Current ratioHigher is better · 63 reported
0.17×
2.35×
6%
33%
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
