Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to One Stop Systems, Inc.
How One Stop Systems, Inc. stacks up
OSS · against 108 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
15/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #81 of 109 · scores higher than 26% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score20 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including OSS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 15?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -4.7% vs peer median 2.2%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -5.0% vs peer median 2.7%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 79% of peers. EBITDA yield: 0.2% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OSS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | OSS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 101 reported | -4.7% | 1.8% | 33% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 114 reported | 0.2% | 6.3% | 33% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 58 reported | -5.0% | 4.4% | 30% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 102 reported | 31.6% | 58.2% | 22% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around OSS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 3 | 35.6B JPY (≈$242M) | 98 | 92 | |
| 3 | 6.7B TWD (≈$208M) | 98 | 70 | |
| 3 | 28.2B JPY (≈$192M) | 98 | 56 | |
| 77 | 74M USD | 26 | 11 | |
| 77 | 136M USD | 26 | 26 | |
| 79 | 139M CAD (≈$101M) | 18 | 40 | |
| 80 | 1.9B SEK (≈$190M) | 17 | 36 | |
| 81 | 122M USD | 15 | 34 | |
| 82 | 5.2B TWD (≈$162M) | 10 | 41 | |
| 82 | 4.6B TWD (≈$141M) | 10 | 30 | |
| 82 | 170M USD | 10 | 5 | |
| 82 | 200M USD | 10 | 32 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score