Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to One Stop Systems, Inc.
How One Stop Systems, Inc. stacks up
OSS · against 114 other Technology companies of similar size
Profitability
11/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #86 of 115 · scores higher than 25% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score14 peers with a profitability score of 10–19, including OSS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 11?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its return on invested capital, operating margin and return on assets, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 97% of peers. Return on invested capital: -54.0% vs peer median 6.8%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 87% of peers. Operating margin: -10.5% vs peer median 6.3%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 76% of peers. Return on assets: -0.8% vs peer median 2.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OSS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | OSS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 101 reported | -54.0% | 2.7% | 12% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 112 reported | -10.5% | 3.1% | 26% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 110 reported | -0.8% | 1.4% | 36% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 102 reported | -18.6% | 3.6% | 22% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 115 reported | 49.3% | 31.2% | 68% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around OSS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.1B MYR (≈$240M) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 12.9B JPY (≈$88M) | 96 | 75 | |
| 3 | 136M EUR (≈$149M) | 95 | 73 | |
| 4 | 29.8B JPY (≈$203M) | 90 | 66 | |
| 4 | 203M EUR (≈$223M) | 90 | 42 | |
| 82 | 1.7B CNY (≈$242M) | 12 | 40 | |
| 82 | 1.5B CNY (≈$209M) | 12 | 31 | |
| 82 | 74M USD | 12 | 11 | |
| 82 | 139M CAD (≈$101M) | 12 | 40 | |
| 86 | 122M USD | 11 | 34 | |
| 87 | 5.2B TWD (≈$162M) | 9 | 41 | |
| 87 | 210M USD | 9 | 30 | |
| 87 | 183M USD | 9 | 29 | |
| 90 | 1.9B SEK (≈$190M) | 8 | 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score