Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Eightco Holdings Inc.
How Eightco Holdings Inc. stacks up
ORBS · against 481 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
6/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #422 of 482 · scores higher than 10% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score68 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including ORBS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 6?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -420.6% vs peer median 4.4%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -13.7% vs peer median 8.8%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -6.5% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ORBS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ORBS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 470 reported | -420.6% | 3.3% | 1% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 493 reported | -13.7% | 8.7% | 1% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 140 reported | -6.5% | 7.0% | 14% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 472 reported | 122.6% | 69.3% | 78% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ORBS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2.3B HKD (≈$296M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 4 | 3.2B HKD (≈$408M) | 99 | 79 | |
| 422 | 576M USD | 6 | 25 | |
| 422 | 563M USD | 6 | 47 | |
| 422 | 9.5B TRY (≈$284M) | 6 | 18 | |
| 422 | 188M USD | 6 | 17 | |
| 422 | 322M USD | 6 | 23 | |
| 422 | 283M USD | 6 | 48 | |
| 422 | 463M USD | 6 | 26 | |
| 422 | 237M USD | 6 | 35 | |
| 435 | 2.9B CNY (≈$408M) | 5 | 28 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score