Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Eightco Holdings Inc.
How Eightco Holdings Inc. stacks up
ORBS · against 487 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
0/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #472 of 488 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score61 peers with a growth score of 0–9, including ORBS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 99% of peers. Revenue growth: -42.7% vs peer median 3.7%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 98% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -24.0% vs peer median 4.3%
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ORBS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ORBS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 492 reported | -42.7% | 1.9% | 3% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 295 reported | Not reported | 0.0% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 487 reported | -24.0% | 2.0% | 2% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ORBS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.3B MYR (≈$277M) | 100 | 60 | |
| 2 | 732.9B KRW (≈$528M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 3.4B CNY (≈$470M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 2 | 1.5B BRL (≈$267M) | 99 | 92 | |
| 472 | 7.07T IDR (≈$439M) | 0 | 22 | |
| 472 | 502M USD | 0 | 2 | |
| 472 | 30.7B INR (≈$368M) | 0 | 18 | |
| 472 | 9.5B TRY (≈$284M) | 0 | 18 | |
| 472 | 322M USD | 0 | 23 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score