Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ORA · against 85 other Utilities companies of similar size
Ranked #67 of 86 · scores higher than 22% of peers · safety percentile 23
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)9 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including ORA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, which is weaker than most Utilities peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ORA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 86 reported | 1.24× | 1.13× | 45% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 83 reported | 0.90 | 0.46 | 9% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 82 reported | 1.05× | 0.98× | 54% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.70T CLP (≈$3.0B) | 98 | 59 | |
| 2 | 3.4B USD | 93 | 43 | |
| 3 | 29.9B CNY (≈$4.2B) | 92 | 65 | |
| 4 | 4.4B USD | 91 | 31 | |
| 5 | 6.6B CHF (≈$7.5B) | 90 | 48 | |
| 63 | 630.0B JPY (≈$4.3B) | 28 | 34 | |
| 64 | 8.2B USD | 27 | 56 | |
| 65 | 5.4B EUR (≈$6.0B) | 26 | 40 | |
| 66 | 5.1B USD | 24 | 50 | |
| 67 | 5.8B USD | 23 | 41 | |
| 68 | 14.9B AUD (≈$9.9B) | 21 | 52 | |
| 69 | 6.3B USD | 21 | 38 | |
| 70 | 3.5B USD | 20 | 53 | |
| 71 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 19 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score