Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
OPTH · against 14 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #10 of 15 · scores higher than 36% of peers · safety percentile 24
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)3 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including OPTH · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | OPTH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 12 reported | 0.29× | 0.40× | 55% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 15 reported | 1.59 | 0.64 | 21% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 15 reported | 1.73× | 1.75× | 43% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22M USD | 81 | 47 | |
| 2 | 2.8B JPY (≈$19M) | 78 | ||
| 3 | 22M AUD (≈$15M) | 73 | 25 | |
| 4 | 9M USD | 63 | 45 | |
| 5 | 23M USD | 58 | ||
| 6 | 3.5B JPY (≈$24M) | 38 | 48 | |
| 7 | 14.3B KRW (≈$10M) | 32 | 53 | |
| 8 | 17M USD | 28 | 18 | |
| 9 | 110M HKD (≈$14M) | 27 | 28 | |
| 10 | 12M USD | 24 | 38 | |
| 11 | 21.3B KRW (≈$15M) | 16 | 28 | |
| 12 | 18M AUD (≈$12M) | 13 | 7 | |
| 13 | 3.4B JPY (≈$23M) | 7 | 5 | |
| 14 | 17M USD | 6 | 10 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score