Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to OPENLANE, Inc.
How OPENLANE, Inc. stacks up
OPLN · against 298 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
70/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #98 of 299 · scores higher than 67% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score36 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including OPLN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 70?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth, 3-year revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 63% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 15.0% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 68% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 8.8% vs peer median 4.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 78% of peers. Revenue growth: 11.8% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OPLN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | OPLN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 299 reported | 11.8% | 5.0% | 77% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 258 reported | 15.0% | 8.2% | 60% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 297 reported | 8.8% | 5.4% | 64% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around OPLN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 2 | 27.1B CNY (≈$3.8B) | 99 | 35 | |
| 2 | 272.3B INR (≈$3.3B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 9.3B USD | 99 | 43 | |
| 5 | 17.6B SAR (≈$4.8B) | 98 | 68 | |
| 92 | 53.5B CNY (≈$7.5B) | 71 | 45 | |
| 92 | 537.3B JPY (≈$3.7B) | 71 | 70 | |
| 92 | 2.5B USD | 71 | 43 | |
| 98 | 4.4B USD | 70 | 49 | |
| 98 | 4.7B USD | 70 | 52 | |
| 100 | 2.6B USD | 69 | 54 | |
| 100 | 2.4B USD | 69 | 81 | |
| 102 | 21.6B CNY (≈$3.0B) | 68 | 65 | |
| 102 | 3.51T KRW (≈$2.5B) | 68 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score