Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ooma, Inc.
How Ooma, Inc. stacks up
OOMA · against 601 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
48/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #289 of 602 · scores higher than 51% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score47 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including OOMA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 48?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.1% vs peer median 2.2%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 2.9% vs peer median 4.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 72% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 5.8% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OOMA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | OOMA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 586 reported | 2.1% | 1.6% | 54% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 618 reported | 4.8% | 3.8% | 55% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 179 reported | 5.8% | 2.0% | 70% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 595 reported | 18.6% | 42.0% | 16% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around OOMA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 763M USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 404M USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 5 | 2.4B HKD (≈$301M) | 98 | 42 | |
| 286 | 3.3B CNY (≈$466M) | 49 | 67 | |
| 289 | 971.1B KRW (≈$699M) | 48 | 61 | |
| 289 | 4.6B CNY (≈$643M) | 48 | 58 | |
| 289 | 1.9B CNY (≈$273M) | 48 | 66 | |
| 289 | 518M USD | 48 | 51 | |
| 289 | 553M EUR (≈$608M) | 48 | 61 | |
| 294 | 3.7B CNY (≈$523M) | 47 | 38 | |
| 294 | 63.0B JPY (≈$429M) | 47 | 66 | |
| 294 | 714M USD | 47 | 21 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score