Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ooma, Inc.
How Ooma, Inc. stacks up
OOMA · against 622 other Technology companies of similar size
Profitability
48/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #231 of 623 · scores higher than 62% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score70 peers with a profitability score of 40–49, including OOMA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 48?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.A mix: stronger return on assets, but weaker operating margin than most Technology peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 62% of peers. Operating margin: 3.6% vs peer median 6.3%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 6.8% vs peer median 6.8%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 66% of peers. Return on assets: 4.8% vs peer median 2.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OOMA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | OOMA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 580 reported | 6.8% | 3.4% | 63% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 618 reported | 3.6% | 3.7% | 49% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 609 reported | 4.8% | 1.3% | 79% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 598 reported | 11.7% | 3.6% | 76% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 623 reported | 61.4% | 27.0% | 88% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around OOMA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 604M AUD (≈$399M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 50.3B JPY (≈$342M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 3 | 56.5B JPY (≈$384M) | 98 | 80 | |
| 3 | 60.1B JPY (≈$409M) | 98 | 72 | |
| 3 | 72.9B JPY (≈$496M) | 98 | 82 | |
| 231 | 4.1B CNY (≈$573M) | 48 | 37 | |
| 231 | 670.3B KRW (≈$483M) | 48 | 39 | |
| 231 | 928M SGD (≈$705M) | 48 | 54 | |
| 231 | 257M EUR (≈$283M) | 48 | 49 | |
| 231 | 518M USD | 48 | 51 | |
| 236 | 4.1B CNY (≈$573M) | 47 | 45 | |
| 236 | 2.3B CNY (≈$320M) | 47 | 60 | |
| 236 | 617.8B KRW (≈$445M) | 47 | 46 | |
| 236 | 5.5B CNY (≈$765M) | 47 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score