Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ooma, Inc.
How Ooma, Inc. stacks up
OOMA · against 478 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Growth
85/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #118 of 479 · scores higher than 74% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score70 peers with a growth score of 80–89, including OOMA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 85?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 67% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 10.3% vs peer median 4.8%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 71% of peers. Revenue growth: 17.2% vs peer median 8.5%
- Earnings per share turned from a loss to a profit. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 11.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OOMA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | OOMA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 496 reported | 17.2% | 13.1% | 59% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 286 reported | Not reported | 22.4% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 471 reported | 10.3% | 9.7% | 53% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around OOMA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38.7B USD | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 25.7B USD | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 898.1B USD | 100 | 85 | |
| 1 | 1.6B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 118 | 3.1B USD | 85 | 64 | |
| 118 | 196.8B USD | 85 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score