Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Onterris, Inc.
How Onterris, Inc. stacks up
ONT · against 948 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
42/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #496 of 949 · scores higher than 48% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score44 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including ONT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 42?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Industrials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -2.0% vs peer median 3.8%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.9% vs peer median 6.9%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 82% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 9.8% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ONT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ONT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 951 reported | -2.0% | 3.2% | 19% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 959 reported | 5.9% | 6.7% | 47% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 195 reported | 9.8% | 3.2% | 74% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 956 reported | 78.1% | 55.3% | 69% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ONT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 462M USD | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 895M EUR (≈$985M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 1 | 323M USD | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 2.9B BRL (≈$517M) | 100 | 68 | |
| 491 | 613M USD | 43 | 24 | |
| 491 | 861M USD | 43 | 42 | |
| 496 | 50.5B JPY (≈$343M) | 42 | 42 | |
| 496 | 1.7B AUD (≈$1.1B) | 42 | 71 | |
| 496 | 551M USD | 42 | 41 | |
| 499 | 3.5B CNY (≈$485M) | 41 | 59 | |
| 499 | 4.6B CNY (≈$644M) | 41 | 44 | |
| 499 | 34.9B TWD (≈$1.1B) | 41 | 67 | |
| 499 | 464M USD | 41 | 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score