Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ON Semiconductor Corporation
How ON Semiconductor Corporation stacks up
ON · against 478 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Growth
28/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #409 of 479 · scores higher than 13% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score37 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including ON · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 28?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 88% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -9.5% vs peer median 4.8%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 79% of peers. Revenue growth: -3.1% vs peer median 8.5%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 73% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 42.1% vs peer median 11.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ON, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ON | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 496 reported | -3.1% | 13.1% | 9% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 286 reported | 42.1% | 22.4% | 62% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 471 reported | -9.5% | 9.7% | 6% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ON| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 965.7B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 405 | 6.4B USD | 29 | 47 | |
| 409 | 1.3B USD | 28 | 74 | |
| 409 | 15.0B USD | 28 | 51 | |
| 409 | 1.7B USD | 28 | 34 | |
| 409 | 28.3B USD | 28 | 42 | |
| 409 | 4.7B USD | 28 | 19 | |
| 409 | 283M USD | 28 | 34 | |
| 409 | 4.9B USD | 28 | 50 | |
| 416 | 443M USD | 27 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score