Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to OneMain Holdings, Inc.
How OneMain Holdings, Inc. stacks up
OMF · against 49 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Valuation
94/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #3 of 50 · scores higher than 96% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score4 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including OMF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 94?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- EBITDA yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 80% of peers. Earnings yield: 11.7% vs peer median 5.7%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 92% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 49.7% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OMF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | OMF | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 71 reported | 11.7% | 5.2% | 90% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 44 reported | Not reported | 5.9% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 33 reported | 49.7% | 6.6% | 94% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 72 reported | 52.0% | 47.9% | 56% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around OMF| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21.2B BRL (≈$3.8B) | 96 | 66 | |
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 96 | 66 | |
| 3 | 6.5B USD | 94 | 48 | |
| 4 | 5.3B GBP (≈$6.9B) | 92 | 79 | |
| 5 | 9.2B GBP (≈$11.9B) | 86 | 58 | |
| 6 | 5.2B USD | 85 | 45 | |
| 7 | 4.3B USD | 81 | 70 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score