Ranked #70 of 70 · scores higher than 0% of peers · safety percentile 0
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)
9 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including OMF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why “Higher relative risk”?
The measures below combine into a safety percentile of 0 among Financial Services companies. It is relative: 67 or more is lower relative risk, 33–66 moderate, below 33 higher.
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Financial Services peers.
▼more borrowing relative to shareholders' equity: weaker than 97% of peers. Debt / equity: 6.73× vs peer median 0.57×
▼a share price that has swung more with the market: weaker than 81% of peers. Beta: 1.19 vs peer median 0.70
●Current ratio is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OMF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
OMF
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Debt / equityLower is better · 66 reported
6.73×
0.78×
3%
33%
BetaLower is better · 69 reported
1.19
0.69
15%
33%
Current ratioHigher is better · 57 reported
Not reported
2.07×
—
—
33%
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
