Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
OMDA · against 473 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #103 of 474 · scores higher than 78% of peers · safety percentile 80
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)55 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including OMDA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | OMDA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 446 reported | Not reported | 0.19× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 447 reported | Not reported | 0.47 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 460 reported | 3.91× | 2.83× | 63% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 3 | 1.1B USD | 100 | ||
| 4 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 35 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 99 | ||
| 99 | 9.5B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 81 | 45 | |
| 100 | 143.3B JPY (≈$975M) | 81 | 61 | |
| 101 | 109.3B JPY (≈$743M) | 81 | 76 | |
| 102 | 142.5B INR (≈$1.7B) | 80 | 71 | |
| 103 | 1.1B USD | 80 | 61 | |
| 104 | 8.9B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 80 | 62 | |
| 105 | 1.8B USD | 79 | 23 | |
| 106 | 1.7B USD | 79 | 30 | |
| 107 | 10.9B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 79 | 72 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score