Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Omnicell, Inc.
How Omnicell, Inc. stacks up
OMCL · against 406 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
61/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #170 of 407 · scores higher than 57% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score50 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including OMCL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 61?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Healthcare peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 71% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 0.3% vs peer median 5.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 8.5% vs peer median 6.1%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 82% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 70.5% vs peer median 9.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OMCL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | OMCL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 410 reported | 8.5% | 6.1% | 56% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 223 reported | 70.5% | 8.6% | 82% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 398 reported | 0.3% | 6.9% | 29% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around OMCL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.9B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 1 | 27.6B SEK (≈$2.8B) | 99 | 76 | |
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 99 | 96 | |
| 1 | 2.8B USD | 99 | 51 | |
| 163 | 14.41T IDR (≈$893M) | 62 | 69 | |
| 170 | 156.7B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 61 | 65 | |
| 170 | 217.6B INR (≈$2.6B) | 61 | 67 | |
| 170 | 3.2B USD | 61 | 65 | |
| 170 | 1.6B USD | 61 | 51 | |
| 170 | 151.7B INR (≈$1.8B) | 61 | 61 | |
| 175 | 2.2B USD | 60 | 36 | |
| 175 | 2.2B USD | 60 | 61 | |
| 177 | 427.8B JPY (≈$2.9B) | 59 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score