Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Olaplex Holdings Inc
How Olaplex Holdings Inc stacks up
OLPX · against 490 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
15/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #440 of 491 · scores higher than 10% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score35 peers with a profitability score of 10–19, including OLPX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 15?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its return on invested capital and return on assets, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 87% of peers. Return on invested capital: -1.9% vs peer median 7.3%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 81% of peers. Return on assets: 0.1% vs peer median 3.3%
- Operating margin is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OLPX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | OLPX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 467 reported | -1.9% | 8.3% | 8% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 490 reported | Not reported | 7.2% | — | — | 33% |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 468 reported | 0.1% | 3.6% | 13% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 457 reported | -1.7% | 9.0% | 13% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 493 reported | 72.4% | 31.1% | 96% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around OLPX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 2.4B USD | 99 | 65 | |
| 3 | 404.0B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 98 | 90 | |
| 3 | 11.2B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 98 | 49 | |
| 5 | 122.9B JPY (≈$836M) | 97 | 83 | |
| 438 | 18.0B CNY (≈$2.5B) | 16 | 11 | |
| 440 | 5.4B CNY (≈$757M) | 15 | 17 | |
| 440 | 6.1B CNY (≈$854M) | 15 | 35 | |
| 440 | 1.1B USD | 15 | 35 | |
| 440 | 1.4B USD | 15 | 37 | |
| 444 | 9.3B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 14 | 31 | |
| 444 | 8.6B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 14 | 33 | |
| 444 | 12.0B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 14 | 31 | |
| 444 | 1.2B USD | 14 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score