Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
OLLI · against 132 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #37 of 133 · scores higher than 73% of peers · safety percentile 74
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)24 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including OLLI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | OLLI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 132 reported | 0.38× | 0.37× | 50% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 132 reported | 0.41 | 0.34 | 42% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 125 reported | 2.23× | 1.61× | 69% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 2 | 29.8B HKD (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 3 | 398.9B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 98 | 77 | |
| 4 | 3.1B USD | 97 | 89 | |
| 5 | 1.06T JPY (≈$7.2B) | 96 | 80 | |
| 33 | 270.6B INR (≈$3.2B) | 76 | 72 | |
| 34 | 651.6B JPY (≈$4.4B) | 76 | 75 | |
| 35 | 797.3B JPY (≈$5.4B) | 76 | 52 | |
| 36 | 24.2B HKD (≈$3.1B) | 74 | 64 | |
| 37 | 5.3B USD | 74 | 71 | |
| 38 | 3.5B USD | 73 | 73 | |
| 39 | 24.7B CNY (≈$3.5B) | 72 | 61 | |
| 40 | 6.4B NZD (≈$3.8B) | 72 | 58 | |
| 41 | 34.8B HKD (≈$4.5B) | 72 | 75 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score