Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
OIS · against 90 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #35 of 91 · scores higher than 62% of peers · safety percentile 64
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)8 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including OIS · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity and current ratio, but weaker beta than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | OIS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 87 reported | 0.06× | 0.48× | 85% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 89 reported | 1.20 | 0.47 | 7% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 92 reported | 2.35× | 1.46× | 77% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 2 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 3 | 677M AUD (≈$447M) | 96 | 37 | |
| 4 | 526M USD | 95 | 36 | |
| 5 | 575M AUD (≈$380M) | 95 | 47 | |
| 31 | 596M USD | 69 | 34 | |
| 32 | 883M USD | 69 | 42 | |
| 33 | 9.34T IDR (≈$579M) | 66 | 41 | |
| 34 | 1.2B AUD (≈$767M) | 66 | 60 | |
| 35 | 534M USD | 64 | 24 | |
| 36 | 4.6B CNY (≈$641M) | 63 | 48 | |
| 37 | 3.4B CNY (≈$473M) | 63 | 45 | |
| 38 | 697M USD | 61 | 50 | |
| 39 | 2.4B CNY (≈$337M) | 58 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score