Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ONE Gas, Inc.
How ONE Gas, Inc. stacks up
OGS · against 93 other Utilities companies of similar size
Valuation
53/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #47 of 94 · scores higher than 51% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score11 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including OGS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 53?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Its metrics sit close to the Utilities norm.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -3.4% vs peer median 0.0%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 9.2% vs peer median 8.6%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.7% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OGS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | OGS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 93 reported | 5.7% | 5.4% | 58% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 94 reported | 9.2% | 9.0% | 53% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 44 reported | -3.4% | -0.7% | 44% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 87 reported | 69.5% | 61.1% | 60% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around OGS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 55.0B HKD (≈$7.0B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 1 | 8.54T CLP (≈$9.4B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 6.9B GBP (≈$9.0B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 4 | 45.8B HKD (≈$5.9B) | 94 | 61 | |
| 4 | 4.84T CLP (≈$5.3B) | 94 | 72 | |
| 43 | 5.2B USD | 56 | 55 | |
| 44 | 40.4B BRL (≈$7.3B) | 55 | 70 | |
| 44 | 6.7B USD | 55 | 59 | |
| 46 | 4.5B NZD (≈$2.7B) | 54 | 67 | |
| 47 | 5.1B USD | 53 | 50 | |
| 48 | 6.6B CHF (≈$7.5B) | 52 | 48 | |
| 49 | 9.1B NZD (≈$5.4B) | 51 | 70 | |
| 49 | 5.4B USD | 51 | 56 | |
| 51 | 42.3B CNY (≈$5.9B) | 50 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score