Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to OceanaGold Corporation
How OceanaGold Corporation stacks up
OGC · against 249 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Valuation
98/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #1 of 250 · scores higher than 99% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score27 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including OGC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 98?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 95% of peers. EBITDA yield: 30.0% vs peer median 8.5%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 96% of peers. Earnings yield: 16.0% vs peer median 3.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OGC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | OGC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 248 reported | 16.0% | 5.4% | 96% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 253 reported | 30.0% | 10.8% | 97% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 79 reported | Not reported | 4.8% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 242 reported | 48.3% | 49.6% | 48% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around OGC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 155.7B ZAR (≈$8.6B) | 98 | 90 | |
| 1 | 69.8B ZAR (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 1 | 5.3B USD | 98 | 81 | |
| 1 | 4.7B AUD (≈$3.1B) | 98 | 87 | |
| 5 | 7.9B USD | 96 | 62 | |
| 5 | 2.2B GBP (≈$2.9B) | 96 | 79 | |
| 5 | 226.1B THB (≈$6.3B) | 96 | 42 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score