Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Omega Flex, Inc.
How Omega Flex, Inc. stacks up
OFLX · against 570 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
49/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #263 of 571 · scores higher than 54% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score22 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including OFLX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 49?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.6% vs peer median 6.9%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.0% vs peer median 3.7%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.4% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OFLX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | OFLX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 562 reported | 4.4% | 2.2% | 60% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 581 reported | 6.6% | 6.2% | 52% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 136 reported | 4.0% | 3.4% | 53% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 569 reported | 30.7% | 60.4% | 21% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around OFLX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 462M USD | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 323M USD | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 2.9B BRL (≈$517M) | 100 | 68 | |
| 259 | 270M USD | 52 | 41 | |
| 262 | 2.0B SEK (≈$204M) | 51 | 51 | |
| 263 | 491.4B KRW (≈$354M) | 49 | 23 | |
| 263 | 460.9B KRW (≈$332M) | 49 | 31 | |
| 263 | 268M USD | 49 | 65 | |
| 263 | 441M USD | 49 | 45 | |
| 267 | 3.8B CNY (≈$529M) | 48 | 33 | |
| 267 | 2.9B CNY (≈$407M) | 48 | 38 | |
| 267 | 19.1B INR (≈$229M) | 48 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score