Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
OCS · against 427 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #256 of 428 · scores higher than 39% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score38 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including OCS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
| Metric | OCS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 413 reported | Not reported | 0.0% | — | — | 30% |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 431 reported | -67.2% | 3.0% | 5% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 200 reported | -18.6% | -8.4% | 30% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 423 reported | 55.4% | 49.3% | 56% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score