Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Oculis Holding AG
How Oculis Holding AG stacks up
OCS · against 422 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Profitability
15/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #352 of 423 · scores higher than 16% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score47 peers with a profitability score of 10–19, including OCS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 15?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its return on assets and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 91% of peers. Return on assets: -41.9% vs peer median 1.7%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 89% of peers. Return on invested capital: -56.2% vs peer median 4.7%
- Operating margin is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OCS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | OCS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 392 reported | -56.2% | 1.1% | 13% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 396 reported | Not reported | 3.5% | — | — | 33% |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 422 reported | -41.9% | 0.5% | 10% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 402 reported | -43.7% | -0.0% | 18% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 442 reported | 0.0% | 39.5% | 4% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around OCS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 595M USD | 99 | 97 | |
| 1 | 433M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 1 | 578M USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 1 | 609M USD | 99 | 91 | |
| 5 | 4.4B CNY (≈$611M) | 98 | 77 | |
| 348 | 643M USD | 16 | 31 | |
| 352 | 642M USD | 15 | 46 | |
| 352 | 296M USD | 15 | 26 | |
| 352 | 275M USD | 15 | 46 | |
| 352 | 424M USD | 15 | 45 | |
| 356 | 11.6B TWD (≈$360M) | 14 | 45 | |
| 356 | 684M USD | 14 | ||
| 358 | 725M USD | 13 | 19 | |
| 358 | 534M USD | 13 | 32 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score