Ranked #191 of 268 · scores higher than 28% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score
26 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including OCFC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 32?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 86% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.5% vs peer median 7.9%
▲a lower price relative to book value (P/B): stronger than 82% of peers. Book yield: 136.0% vs peer median 79.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OCFC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
OCFC
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Earnings yieldHigher is better · 272 reported
4.4%
7.9%
14%
60%
EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 60 reported
Not reported
8.9%
—
—
Context only
Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 151 reported
6.4%
7.9%
36%
Context only
Book yieldHigher is better · 268 reported
133.6%
83.2%
82%
40%
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
