Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc.
How Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. stacks up
OBIO · against 557 other Healthcare companies listed in US-listed
Profitability
8/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #469 of 558 · scores higher than 14% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score100 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including OBIO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 8?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its return on invested capital, return on assets and operating margin, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 97% of peers. Return on invested capital: -330.8% vs peer median 4.7%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 94% of peers. Return on assets: -51.0% vs peer median 1.7%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 89% of peers. Operating margin: -181.4% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OBIO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | OBIO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 517 reported | -330.8% | -7.0% | 6% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 479 reported | -181.4% | -2.4% | 22% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 582 reported | -51.0% | -7.8% | 12% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 531 reported | -397.3% | -19.7% | 3% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 601 reported | 99.5% | 43.9% | 96% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around OBIO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 595M USD | 99 | 97 | |
| 1 | 433M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 1 | 17.9B USD | 99 | 76 | |
| 1 | 52.9B USD | 99 | 57 | |
| 1 | 578M USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 469 | 357M USD | 8 | 32 | |
| 469 | 172M USD | 8 | 41 | |
| 469 | 264M USD | 8 | 30 | |
| 469 | 332M USD | 8 | 35 | |
| 469 | 334M USD | 8 | 49 | |
| 469 | 1.9B USD | 8 | 18 | |
| 469 | 303M USD | 8 | 27 | |
| 469 | 5.4B USD | 8 | 24 | |
| 469 | 885M USD | 8 | 33 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score